Firm Parameters
Valuation: Knight vs Day
| Item | Knight | Day |
|---|---|---|
| Debt Repayment | $49 | $60 |
| Boom Outcome (50% prob) | ||
| -- Equity claim | $51 | $40 |
| -- Debt claim | $49 | $60 |
| Recession Outcome (50% prob) | ||
| -- Equity claim | $1 | $0 |
| -- Debt claim | $49 | $50 |
| Value of Equity (PV) | $23.64 | $18.18 |
| Value of Debt (PV) | $44.54 | $50.00 |
| Total Firm Value | $68.18 | $68.18 |
Firm Value vs Debt Level (No Distress Costs)
MM prediction: flat line. Firm value independent of capital structure.
Firm Value vs Debt Level (With Distress Costs)
With bankruptcy costs: optimal capital structure. Increasing debt increases distress costs.
Static Tradeoff Theory: Tax Shields vs Distress Costs
The Theory: Firms choose debt levels by trading off two competing forces:
- Tax Shield Benefit (+): Debt is tax-deductible. Interest payments reduce taxes.
- Distress Cost Penalty (-): Higher debt increases probability of financial distress and bankruptcy.
Optimal Level: The debt level where the marginal tax shield equals the marginal distress cost. Too little debt wastes the tax shield. Too much debt risks bankruptcy.
Why It Matters: This explains why real firms use moderate levels of debt. If tax shields were free, all firms would be 100% debt-financed (MM without taxes). But distress costs are real -- legal fees, lost customers, employee turnover -- so firms choose a balanced capital structure.